(no subject)
Apr. 12th, 2006 09:27 amAnother useful bit of info tempting me towards an Intel iMac - I'm going to get the 17" eventually, not the 20", as it will fit my office desk better and saves a fair bit of money (though I'm annoyed that I lose the internal modem - I use it for faxing).
Anyway; iMac and Mac Mini CPUs are socketed. They can be upgraded. Now, the person that tried a Core Duo (Yonah) 2.16GHz in a 1.5GHz Core Solo Mini with success has done the same trick with (I am guess a pre-production/advanced run) Merom 64-bit chip.
And it works.
So: I reckon the G5 replacement will have Core Duo Meroms - 64 bit was a bit deal for the G5 desktop - and may have two units, preserving the Quad Core. However, I am more interested in the idea that a Core Duo iMac could become a dual-core 64 bit system in the medium term for the cost of a CPU. I wonder if OS X is improved by this. Apparently the Merom runs pretty well (but the poster providing the information appears to be under some sort of NDA, so was only able to say "It works" and "It's this fast").
Benchmarks are also suggesting that under BootCamp, Photoshop on XP2 is slightly quicker on the Mac than 'similar' PCs. Can't think of a good reason for that. BootCamp has also fallen foul of a fun bug; messing with the XP2 Disk Administration utility fucks up the bootloader and OS X stops working - fixed by running the OS X DVD, which presumably tidies up the partitions again. I guess part of Beta testing software is discovering what level of stupid users can reach.
Anyway; iMac and Mac Mini CPUs are socketed. They can be upgraded. Now, the person that tried a Core Duo (Yonah) 2.16GHz in a 1.5GHz Core Solo Mini with success has done the same trick with (I am guess a pre-production/advanced run) Merom 64-bit chip.
And it works.
So: I reckon the G5 replacement will have Core Duo Meroms - 64 bit was a bit deal for the G5 desktop - and may have two units, preserving the Quad Core. However, I am more interested in the idea that a Core Duo iMac could become a dual-core 64 bit system in the medium term for the cost of a CPU. I wonder if OS X is improved by this. Apparently the Merom runs pretty well (but the poster providing the information appears to be under some sort of NDA, so was only able to say "It works" and "It's this fast").
Benchmarks are also suggesting that under BootCamp, Photoshop on XP2 is slightly quicker on the Mac than 'similar' PCs. Can't think of a good reason for that. BootCamp has also fallen foul of a fun bug; messing with the XP2 Disk Administration utility fucks up the bootloader and OS X stops working - fixed by running the OS X DVD, which presumably tidies up the partitions again. I guess part of Beta testing software is discovering what level of stupid users can reach.